We have also added Figure 2 to provide more information about the location of the households interviewed. ![]() Please, the structure of the paper has been modified by appropriately labeling and placing Figure 1 and all the tables in the text. Response: Dear reviewer, thank you for making time from your busy schedules to review our manuscript. Lot of material has been worked through to compose the manuscript. The topic is definitely necessary and approach in this manuscript relevant. Reviewer Comments and Suggestions: It was interesting to read this manuscript. Response to Reviewer 1 Comments and Suggestions on land-1967330 Right now the reading and understanding the work is really difficult. All the figures and tables should come right after they are first mentioned in the text. Before the table 4 Table 3 comes but is first mentioned after table 4. ![]() Row 807: The results of the farm investment impact of direct and indirect exposure to LSLA by domestic and foreign entities are presented in Table 4. It would be better if the table is situated right after it is fist mentioned. Table 1 is first mentioned in row 419 but the table itself is in row 451. One example on how the figure simplifies understanding the use methods can be find here: Figure 2. One detailed figure about data collections could give better overview on how the data was collected, what kind of data was collected, how many households from which district was involved etc. It is really difficult to read such long paragraphs of tight text. Paragraphs should be shortened (divided into more shorter paragraphs). ![]() I suggest to present the figure after the sentence that begins in row 378 and ends in row 389 ( The first stage consisted of the selection of six districts (Figure 1) based on the predominance of vast tracks of arable land under commercial deals.) From the readers point of view it would be better if the figure comes right after it is first mentioned. The structure of the paper needs modifications to make it more reader friendly.įigure 1 is first mentioned in row 379 but the figure itself is presented in row 451. It was interesting to read this manuscript.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |